One of the topics on which there is most ambiguity in Hindu society is the division of eras. The most ancient and most detailed thinking related to time has happened in India only. Therefore, the scriptures themselves are evidence related to Indian thinking about time. Whatever has been written about him by foreigners, especially in the 19th and 20th centuries AD, is inauthentic. In fact, as soon as they succeeded in bringing the inhabitants and countries outside their region under their control for a short time through deceit, the people of Europe, who earlier never tired of praising the culture and civilization of India, suddenly started considering it as belonging to Europe only. Decided to tell the effect. They felt that through this we would especially be able to keep India under our control for a long period of time. If we talk about indirect control, then in a sense they have been successful in it. But apparently they had to give up their rule over India within 90 years. Even if he tells his followers while leaving
Kept transferring power. First of all, it should be known in this matter that the civilization and culture of the ancient districts of India itself, either knowingly or unknowingly, they propagated completely different civilizations. Everyone knows that Sumer and Yavana regions were the districts of ancient India. But in order to portray their knowledge tradition as ancient, the Euro-Christian communities suddenly started calling the Yavan province a part of an imaginary region called Europe from the 19th century AD. The Europeans themselves have written that before the 19th century AD there was nothing called Europe in the world. This means that those geographical areas had their own place, but they were never called Europe before.
Due to being a very difficult hilly and marshy area, the entire area which is called Europe today was like isolated areas. Their mutual contacts were negligible before the 17th century AD. That's why he envisioned the existence of different civilizations at short distances in India also. Due to the rule of Indian kings in the present Indian region, they had to call it the region of a single Hindu civilization, but they propagated the idea of Sumer and Yavana regions being separate civilizations and talked about the astrology developed in Sumer and Yavana regions and from it Indian astrology. Tried to describe it as affected. Whereas in reality these areas were a part of India and the astrology found here was the astrology of India itself. But it is also true that in the astrology that spread in Europe, local beliefs found place to a large extent. Later, their influences were also found in Indian astrology itself. For example, the philosopher Francis Bacon said that the stars are benevolent and they can also cause sorrow, both of these qualities are present in the stars.
Ptolemy, who is said to be both a Yavana and a Roman, is also a famous astrologer. In the 18th century AD, the German philosopher and poet Goethe, who called 'Abhigyan Shakuntalam' the world's best play, started his memoirs with the planetary positions at the time of his birth. From then till now astrology has great influence in Europe. Therefore, the possibility cannot be avoided that Indian astrology may have received some elements from later European contact. But the main thing is that the subtle thinking about time that has happened in India from the Vedic period till today has not happened in Europe. Even when people like Luther were preaching that Joshua (Jesus) had ordered the Sun to remain stationary and since then the Sun has remained stationary, even then a huge literature of astrology was being created in India. In the writings found in the name of Plato, Plato's opinion is stated that the Earth is cubic. Thus, compared to the astrology of India, the astrologers of Euro-Christian states and also of Yavana state remain less knowledgeable. That is why, out of jealousy, these people have made ridiculous discussions to show that Indian astrology is influenced by Europe. But this is also a fact that the permanent belief regarding eras which has become permanent in India over the last few centuries is absent in the ancient Vedic literature and the Mahabharata period. The calculations regarding the Yugas may be true regarding some notable changes taking place in the whole earth, but the propaganda that has been spread regarding them that Kaliyuga has now arrived and hence there will only be decline, is not a Vedic statement. It is the opposite of Kaaldarshan. Because from the Vedic period to the Mahabharata period and even after that, we repeatedly find the classical rendering that the king is the cause of time.
Who is the king in India?
But the problem is that after 15 August 1947 no one in India the king is no more. There is a governance system. Which was made by the British in the service of the King or Queen of Britain. That structure was taken as it was. It has three main organs – legislature, executive and judiciary. Under the executive are the police and civil services and also the armies. Candidates stand for these various posts and are elected. There are various categories of posts for which selection is made, which include the highest ranking officers, Class I officers, Class II and III officers and employees and Class IV employees. Out of these, the method of selecting candidates for the legislature is voting. MLAs and MPs are elected by voting. Then the party which has majority is invited by the President to form the cabinet. The members of the Cabinet are the heads of their respective departmental executives. Thus, they are elected and temporary executive officers. All the remaining departmental officers and employees of the executive are permanent and appointed, not elected.
Process of appointment to government posts
The method of selecting candidates for various organs of the army, police and civil administration is determined by the officials of those organs themselves and there are customary rules. There is no king in India and no one even proudly calls himself a king. No king is performing Ashwamedha Yagya or Rajasuya Yagya because there is no king. There is every possibility of change of Prime Minister at least every fifth year. Ashwamedha Yagya was performed in the interest of the entire nation and only the emperor has the right to perform it. Officials of the legislature and executive cannot be called kings and they have every right to perform puja like ordinary householders or ordinary government officials. The Prime Minister of the present Christian inspired democracy cannot be called a king by doing propaganda. He cannot be made a king.
Interrelationship of votes, ideas and education
Only freedom of education can give freedom of conscience, independent education gives freedom of conscience. Education under the state produces thoughts and feelings under the state. People vote to elect state leaders. Voting is done with discretion. It is given with thought and emotion. Thoughts, feelings and wisdom are formed through education.
What for of education hasto be
The rulers have taken this into their own hands. The rulers decide what education should be given to the people, that is, the rulers decide that how to awaken conscience, thoughts and feelings in the minds of people and what knowledge should be awakened. In this way, people vote according to the thoughts and feelings created and produced by the rulers, and with that vote the rulers are elected.
Rulers accept people's pressure
Christians put pressure on the state in India and the teaching of Christianity having received money from the government treasury, it has spread it across the country and continues to spread it. Muslims put pressure on the Indian state and spread the teachings of Islam with funds from the treasury of the central and state governments. And they are spreading it. A vocal section of Hindus opposed Islam and Christianity. Education of atheism by adjusting to the wider environment of education have fully followed the government decision to spread among Hindus and thus officially atheists and Europeans and Muslims ay adopting superstitions and performing puja rituals etc. at home, they keep getting free a little bit.
No pressure was ever exerted in favor of Hindu religion
Thus, the situation is that the state should also protect the Hindu religion, the knowledge tradition of Sanatan Dharma should get an official place in education so that the values of Sanatan Dharma are strengthened in the Hindu children and they can build the social system and political system in accordance with the Vedic knowledge tradition. No decisive step has been taken till date in this direction. Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya ji had made very important efforts in this direction. But after some time of his departure, that Hindu University also became like other Euro-Indian universities and there is no study of Indian contexts and basic sciences in humanities i.e. political science, sociology, psychology, yoga, finance etc. and in history. . Only such references are cited which bear resemblance to the European knowledge tradition. On top of that, due to a widespread concept of time, people remain disappointed about both the state and the society, considering it to be Kaliyuga. Whereas naturally they keep working hard for material and social progress in their personal lives. In this way, the beliefs of physical and social progress are linked to continuous efforts, while the beliefs of intellectual progress are linked to the European view of time. Due to this, the strong will to build a better state is not widespread among the Hindus, this is very big! There is a situation of dilemma.
.jpg)
