Seun Yadav ruled a major part of south India from 9th century to 15th century. Their empire was spread from Devgiri to Nasik. In 'Kale Gaon' of Mahadev Yadav, Godavari was called as ornament of Seun country. Ekamdev Yadav emperor'e empire was spread to Narmada river. Yadav ruled the region for 700 years and Muslim ruled the region for 100 years. (Yadav, earlier mentioned. Section 1, Part 2, Chapter 8 and 9)

Kakatiya dynasty

Kakatiya dynasty ruled from 11th century to 14th century. Kakatiya emperor Pratap Rudradev defeated Alauddin. Whose commander asked for help from Maharaja Ramdev and launched attack Kakatiya dynasty jointly. Maharaja Rudradev signed the treaty with him. (An Advanced History of India, Page 295-308, Macmilan New Delhi, Majumdar etc)

Vardhan dynasty

There was king Ishan Varman in the dynasty tradition of vedic era emperor Ashvapati. He set up huge empire in the mid of 6th century. He defeated Hun, Andhra, Shuliko and Gaur. He shares good relation with Magadh dynasty. 
Later, there were Maharaj Nar Vardhan, Rajyavardhan,  Adityavardhan,  Prabhkarbardhan and Harshvardhan in the dynasty of Maharaj Pushyabhuti in Srikanth country. World famous Chinese traveller Hen sang has remembered them. Harshvardhan waged war with Gaur emperor Shashank. Harsh's sister Rajyasri got married to emperor Grih Varman who died during battle with Malwa. Vardhan ruled the Kanyakubj region. Emperor Harsh ruled the entire North India for 30 years. He used to donate heavily in Prayag mahotsav annually. When Tswan has described it. Great poet and kadambarikar Banbhatt has described his empire. (Devahuti: Harsh, A Political Study, Oxford, 1983)

Other great dynasty

Vakatak, Vashishtha dynasty, traikutak, Mathar, Nag dynasty, Aabhir ruled many empires. The area of each state was equal to that of England. It's clear that England never challenged Indian emperors. Because 50 England could be accommodated in India.
Even today, area of India is around 20 times to that of England.  
After Maurya and Gupt dynasty, Gaur ruled Bengal and Odisha. Later Pal dynasty ruled them. Great Pal dynasty started in Bengal from 8th century. Around 18 great emperors ruled the state for 400 years. Later, Sen dynasty came to power there. It ruled Bengal, Bihar, Odisha and Eastern UP. There were great poet Jaidev and Halayudh in that period (during the regime of Maharaj Lakshman Singh). (Rameshchandra Majumdar, Section 4 and 5)
In 13th century, with 10000 Muslim horse riders, Bakhtiyar Khilji attacked famous education centre 'Nadia' of Bengal and butchered 50, 000 Buddhist monks. They also burnt huge library. (Majumdar)
Kamrup emperor got information of it. He attacked Bakhtiyar military and killed 9900 horse riders. He fled away from the battlefield. 
Bakhtiyar burnt the library and killed many scholars on 1261 vikram samvat. Hindu kings ruled half part of India. It was Hindu kings who turned their religion. They became Muslims due to fear. (Majumdar)

Spread of East India Company in Bengal

East India Company borrowed loan from famous Jagat Seth of Bengal and started business. Palasi battle not happened. Jagat Seth defeated Sirajudaula. 
The company got benefited from Hindu-Muslim rivalry. East India Company developed in Bengal. Murshid Kuli Khan was a Hindu who became Muslim to keep Aurangjeb happy. Auranjeb made him his deevan in Bengal. Murshid started to inflict pain to the Hindu kings who supported East India Company. Hindu kings ruled Vardhman, Midnapore, Vishnupur, Chandrapur, Krishna Nagar, Mangal Kot, Panchet, Sen Pahari, Katwa and Virbhum in 18th century. (Majumdar)
After death of king, Sufi Nur Ul Haq convinced his elder son to become Muslim. Hindu citizens also turned Muslim. Muslim king ruled the region for 24 years. Once again, Hindu religion spread there. (Legacy of Muslim Rule in India: Kishori Sharan Lal, Aaditya Delhi, 1992)

Reality of so-called Muslim era

There are so many false facts and misconceptions about Muslim effect in India that people forgot the facts. Post independence, those who wrote history for government-run educational institutions and entire education system, followed no universal norms. 
Only internal truths of any country are the proof for writing history. European countries too follow this norms but our leftist or communist historians followed no norms. They provided a lots of materials to bring communist rule in the country. They touched no internal facts because they knew no Sanskrit language. 
All the primary sources are available in Sanskrit language. They are also available in Tamil and other Indian languages. Historians had started to pen down history in English language first time in 20th century. Earlier, stories were deemed as history. In 1961, EH Kar in his book 'What Is History', defined history. He clearly said that history is to analyse in and around capital of any state. It was natural to say this because similar incidents happened in England while writing history. there were over 20 states in England till 20th century but due to promotion of a particular king, the people started to call  kings of London and its surrounding areas as British emperors. Finally, they got success. (See: An Utterly Impartial History of Britain by John o''Farrel, Black Swan, London, specially chapter 4, 5, 6 and 7)
For the first time in aftermath of 19th century, British empire came to existence and at the same time several nations emerged. That's why writers started to write modern history in 19th and 20th century. Their yardstick was to give importance to central government and set up it. Analysing the incidents in this context is called history writing.
Problem created that there were few primary evidences for ancient history. History was imagined on the basis of those subjects like coins, bones and residue of other things are nothing but an imagination due to lack of written proofs. The people of Europe and England repeatedly write that it's assumption, it seems that etc. No authentic history can be written on the basis of 4 or 6 residue or part of bones or torn papers. Europe has no authentic evidences. 
The condition of India is quite different from that of Europe. The writers have been writing vipul history in India since time immemorial. There were many internal evidences here. Therefore, it's easy to pen down real history here. It has a old tradition. Most of the tourists showered praise on India but at the same time, they started to demean Indians in 20th century when they thought that they can rule the country. They started to write false story about India. For example, Alexander Daw tried to call history of India during Muslim rulers as authentic. HM Elliot started writing history and highlighted his objectives.

Maurya Empire

According to Indian historical holy scripture, the period of Chandragupta Maurya is 18thcentury BC, while disciple of William Jones believes it 4th century BC. The inscriptions of Chandragupta Maurya and Emperor Ashoka mention about their contemporary kings. The Yavans in the inscription of Ashoka at Jalalabad have been called citizens of emperor Ashoka whose empire was spread from Himalaya to Chennai. But Ashoka has never accepted himself as follower of Buddhism. He declares himself as follower of religion and sadharm. (DR Bhandarkar, Ashoka, Kolkata, 1899).

Gupta Empire

Gupta dynasty emperor is the second largest emperor who ruled from 375 BC to 6thcentury. Later, Chandragupta Vikramaditya and Kumargupta First and Skandgupta of this empire defeated Hun military. The Hun is Indian kshtriya which is mentioned in Ramayana and Mahabharata. They ruled entire Europe and Arabic region and one fourth of the world was under their kingdom. But the mighty kshtriya of India didn’t allow them to enter the country.
Emperor Samudragupta, Chandragupta II and Kumargupta I performed yagya and provided shelter to the Buddhism and Jainism. Great poet Kalidas, great playwright Vishakhadatta, great koshkar Amar Singh, great mathematician Aryabhatta, Varah Mihir and Brahmgupta were in the regime of Emperor Chandragupta Vikramaditya. Patliputra was the capital of the Gupta Emperor. There are proofs of architecture Gupta Emperor at Mehrauli of Delhi and Nalanda of Bihar.

Emperor Kanishka dynasty

The Kanishka Empire was spread from Gandhar to south India and Chinese Turkishtan. Emperor Kanishka was smart who believes in religious scriptures. Therefore, they used to give respect to the Buddhism and organise Buddhist sangiti. The picture of Lord Vishnu, Lord Shiva and Lord Buddha and other deities were inscribed on their coins. Huvishka and Vasudeva were the chivalric kings. They were follower of both the Lord Shiva and Lord Vishnu. (Indian History Kosh, Page 75, Hindi Committee Uttar Pradesh, Sachchidanand Bhattacharya)

Satavahana Empire

It’s the fourth largest empire which started many centuries before the Christ and ruled to the end of fifth century. Satavahana got married with Yavan. (History Of South India: Neelkanth Shashtri from 1 to 4, Mumbai 1962)

Malwa Empire

The great Malwa Empire is the fifth largest empire. Great emperor Kartavirya Arjuna and other emperors ruled for thousands of years. The branch of Malwa was known as Bhoj dynasty. It’s also mentioned in Mahabharata period. Later, Emperor Bhojraj was famous. (History and Culture of Indian People, Part 2, Chapter 11)

Great Emperor Vikramaditya

Vikramaditya was the great emperor whose empire was spread from west India to central India. It was larger than any state of Europe.

Malwa ruled a major part of India and its capital was Ujjaini. Yashodharman was the famous emperor in 6thcentury in Malwa dynasty. He defeated Mihirgul. There are two pillars of Yashodharma at Mandsor of Madhya Pradesh. According to which, after 600 years of great emperor Vikramaditya, he ruled from Brahmaputra to sea and from Himalaya to Mahendra Giri mountain.

Chola Emperor

This emperor ruled from south India to Sri Lanka from the beginning of century to 13th century. Chola emperor Rajendra I was very chivalric. He ruled from Bengal, Bihar, Odisha to Andaman Nicobar. Later, Vijaynagar empire was famous for Hindus. (Yadavas Through Ages, Part 1, Part 2)

Chalukya Empire

Chalukyas were the ancestors of chandravanshi kings of Ayodhya who made their capital at Vatapi. Emperor Pulakeshin I performed Ashwamedh yagya. There are many historical proofs for Chalukya empire. Lord Vishnu and Swami Kartikeya were their kul deity and ishta deity respectively. Twenty one Chalukya emperors were very famous and they ruled till beginning of 13th century. Twenty seven other emperors were in this dynasty.

Pandya, Pallav, Rashtrakut, Cher (Kerala) empire

There were also Pandya dynasty, Cher dynasty, Pallav dynasty and Rashtrakut dynasty. They were the parts of Maharaja Yayati. Chola, Cher, Kerala and Rashtrakut dynasty were in the branch of Turvush in the dynasty of Somvanshi. Shaka, Hun and Yavan were the dynasty of this branch. They ruled China, Mongolia, Yavan province, Russia, France, Germany, Rome and Spain for years.
There was Dradyu in the dynasty of Maharaj Yayati. He set up Gandhar state. Dyud purohit belongs to this dynasty. Dyud and Kelt ruled many states of Europe.
Pandya ruled from 6th  century BC to year 1378. Yavan travellers mentioned the state of Pandya and called them as ancestor of Lord Krishna. Turvasu and Yady are siblings.
Ancient Tamil Sangam Literature mentions about state of Pandya. After Megasthenes, yavan travellers Periplas and Talmi described about prosperity of state. Marcopolo too had visited the state twice in 13th century. Later, it was linked with Vijaynagar empire. It existed as Mysore till August 15, 1947.
Cher ruled Kerala. Talmi described about trade relation between Cher and Yavan. Chola dynasty ruled upto 2700 years. The inscription of Emperor Ashoka describes Chola state as free state. There were 25 other chivalric Chola emperors. (The Age of Emperial Unity: Rameshchandra Mazumdar, Chapter 15)

Other state of South India

Tashtrakut dynasty ruled a major part of south India from 736 year to 973 year. There were 14 valour emperors. Krishna I built Kailash Temple of Ellora. Emperor Dhruv defeated Gurjara Pratihara ruler Vatsraj. Fifth emperor Govind III ruled north India. It’s said that Arabic trader Suleman visited India. He had termed Amoghvarsh as one of the four greatest rulers in the world. Eighth ruler Indra III won Kannauj state. Rashtrakut built temple. (Neelkanth Shashtri earlier said)  

Great Kalchuri Empire

Kulchuri dynasty was also the great dynasty of India. They ruled around one third of India like Mahakaushal, Vindhya, Mahishmati, Narmada region, Malva, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Karnataka for thousands of years. The last emperor was Vijjhal. There was a great Kulchuri emperor Maharaj Gangeyadeva in 11thcentury. He got title of Vikramaditya.
He had friendly term with Maharaj Bhoj. They ruled Gorakhpur, Bahraich, Kushinagar and south Kaushal or Chhatishgarh. They got weakened in war with Chandel. (The Classical Age, Chapter 13-14, Mazumdar)

Hoysala Empire

They ruled Karnataka from 11thcentury to 14thcentury. They had enmity with Parmar emperor. Malik killed Hoysala emperor Ballal deceitfully. Later, this region became part of Vijaynagar empire. Alauddin lost mental balance and fell sick. After three years, he died. (Neelkanth Shashtri earlier said)

Vijaynagar Empire

Vijaynagar empire was spread under the leadership of Harihar and Bukka. It continued till 20th century. It was very prosperous empire. Great Swami Vidyaranya was the source of inspiration for this empire (Same).

Gang Empire 

They ruled a major part of Karnataka and Odisha from 2nd century to 11th century. Gang emperor’s minister Chamund Rai got built 56 ft high mammoth statue of Gomateshwara at Shravanabelagola in 10thcentury. There were 11 courageous emperors in Gang dynasty. Singhan Yadav ruled Odisha, Mysore and Gujarat in 13thcentury. Alauddin Khilji signed treaty with Emperor Ramchandra Dev and offered to pay a certain amount to the latter. He convinced Ramchandra Dev to fight with Kakatiya dynasty emperor Rudradev who later also signed treaty with Alauddin. It was a wise decision. (Same Neelkanth Shashtri). 

Universal utility of history:
Generally the history is a tool to know and understand the past incidents of the world. The history also mentions the truth and the evidences of country and society and the incidents happened in the world those day. We know the nature, power and weakness of ourselves and societies. It also provides knowledge of strategic power and capacity of ourselves and others so that our power can be boosted to confront with others.
Valmiki Ramayana describes about Bahvik, Yavan, Darad. Parsik and Yavan province are known as state of Uttarapath in Mahabharata and Raghuvansham.
(Valimiki Ramayana, Ayodhya Kand, 68/18-19; Mahabharata, Bhishma Parv, Jambukhand Vinirman Parv, Chapter 9 and 20; Raghuvansham, Fourth Sarg, Shloka 60-64)
The 20th chapter of Bhishma Parv in Mahabharata describes Kaurava and Pandava and military of both the sides. The Kaurava military describes kings and militaries of the Shaka, the Pahalava and the Yavana under control of Kripacharya. According to Manusmriti, the Yavana, the Shaka, the Bahvik, the Pahalava, the Kirata, the Parada are those kshatriya castes which got demeaned due to lack of the yagya and refinement. Therefore, the Yavana and the Bahvik have always been the part of India. The Yavana and the Rome were also the part of Shaka which are Indian kshatriya.
The Yavana and the Rome had never been part of Europe. They had been part of India and Jambudweep for thousands of years.

The Yavana province was declared as Europe in 19th century
When the Europeans particularly its priests knew the false news spread by themselves about the world and it was proved that there are vast civilisations in the world then the intellectuals got disturbed and tried to find out ancient great history of Europe. Later, they tried to write its history. They started to call the Yavana and the Rome regions of Mediterranean Sea. However, they are different from cold region of central Europe. They are warm region and related with India. Turkey, Rome and Yavana have always been  part of India (See Mahabharata Bhishma Parv Chapter 20)
There was a sprawling temple of Atula Devi (power) at Agrapur (renamed by the priests as Akropolis). It was famous for its greatness for around 1.5 thousands of years. The idol was offered prayer with jewelleries made of gold and elephant teeth. In 15thcentury, the priests snatched it and declared as church (A short history of world, Jaffery Blaney, Penguin, New Delhi 2001, Chapter 61 Page 107). Later, the Muslims snatched it from the Christians and built mosque. The military of Venice demolished it in 1687. There has been Indian imprint on language, food items and culture till recently.     
The Christianity developed first time in 19thcentury in Yavana province. Till mid 20thcentury, there were 8000 christian priests in entire Yavana province. And they were married according to the Yavana tradition as that was the part of Brahmin tradition of India. Great poet Homer also mentioned about Elo who is highly influenced by Mahabharata.

No internal evidence of Alexander attack
There is no internal evidence of attack by Alexander on India. Seven year ago from the beginning of 19th century, priest William Zones wrote the story of Alexander and termed him the great for the first time citing Indica of Megasthenes. There is no evidence of that Indica. No poetry and write up mentions about Alexander coming to India.
Page 537-540 of Encyclopaedia Americana edited by Bernard mentions that Alexander (king of Makdunia) moved from Palla (Indian name) and reached Patal along Dajla Farat river and returned through Takshila through Makrana to Kabul. Because Alexander didn’t dare to enter into India listening about mighty power of military of India’s emperor Paurav Raj. Page 540 of part 1 of Encyclopaedia Americana says that military of Alexander considered moving forward from Hindukush worthless and Alexander knew that Sindhu is not river but a sea. Therefore it’s impossible for him to even think about conquering India. This story was written and spread.
Only Encyclopaedia Americana presented speeches of British priests as historical evidence that there had been great emperor Alexander. Earlier, the priests used to call Alexander Yavana commander. Later they started to call him Makdunia emperor.
The Indians are unaware of the fact that 700 years ago Alexander era, the entire Yavana was divided into 9 separate states. Out of which Sparta and Antika were the prominent ones, while Makdunia was the smallest state. It’s of 250 km long and 7 km wide. Therefore, it’s smaller than that of Gorakhpur or Gazipur district of Uttar Pradesh. The total population was around 1 lakh. Presently, population of Makdunia is around 21 lakh. It’s known as republica Makdunia.
Entire Yavana province including Makdunia was won by defeating Parsik king who was in really the king of India in 380 BC. It’s said that after his father’s death, Alexander waged war with Parsik military. Nobody knows the results of this war. Because, few days later, he returned entire region to the Parsik king.
Although, Alexander never moved Rome, Europe, America, Australia, but the Christian priests started to call him great after 2,200 years of his birth. He never dared to confront with his contemporary kings. He became king at the age of only 22 years and died after 11 years. After few days, the Shaka won Makdunia.
There were vast states in India those days. It’s matter of inferior complexity and coward to term Alexander touching boundary of India as his victory in the time of Maurya dynasty, Gupt dynasty etc. 

To be continue...