Great history of Natural Nation India

Universal utility of history:
Generally the history is a tool to know and understand the past incidents of the world. The history also mentions the truth and the evidences of country and society and the incidents happened in the world those day. We know the nature, power and weakness of ourselves and societies. It also provides knowledge of strategic power and capacity of ourselves and others so that our power can be boosted to confront with others.
Valmiki Ramayana describes about Bahvik, Yavan, Darad. Parsik and Yavan province are known as state of Uttarapath in Mahabharata and Raghuvansham.
(Valimiki Ramayana, Ayodhya Kand, 68/18-19; Mahabharata, Bhishma Parv, Jambukhand Vinirman Parv, Chapter 9 and 20; Raghuvansham, Fourth Sarg, Shloka 60-64)
The 20th chapter of Bhishma Parv in Mahabharata describes Kaurava and Pandava and military of both the sides. The Kaurava military describes kings and militaries of the Shaka, the Pahalava and the Yavana under control of Kripacharya. According to Manusmriti, the Yavana, the Shaka, the Bahvik, the Pahalava, the Kirata, the Parada are those kshatriya castes which got demeaned due to lack of the yagya and refinement. Therefore, the Yavana and the Bahvik have always been the part of India. The Yavana and the Rome were also the part of Shaka which are Indian kshatriya.
The Yavana and the Rome had never been part of Europe. They had been part of India and Jambudweep for thousands of years.

The Yavana province was declared as Europe in 19th century
When the Europeans particularly its priests knew the false news spread by themselves about the world and it was proved that there are vast civilisations in the world then the intellectuals got disturbed and tried to find out ancient great history of Europe. Later, they tried to write its history. They started to call the Yavana and the Rome regions of Mediterranean Sea. However, they are different from cold region of central Europe. They are warm region and related with India. Turkey, Rome and Yavana have always been  part of India (See Mahabharata Bhishma Parv Chapter 20)
There was a sprawling temple of Atula Devi (power) at Agrapur (renamed by the priests as Akropolis). It was famous for its greatness for around 1.5 thousands of years. The idol was offered prayer with jewelleries made of gold and elephant teeth. In 15thcentury, the priests snatched it and declared as church (A short history of world, Jaffery Blaney, Penguin, New Delhi 2001, Chapter 61 Page 107). Later, the Muslims snatched it from the Christians and built mosque. The military of Venice demolished it in 1687. There has been Indian imprint on language, food items and culture till recently.     
The Christianity developed first time in 19thcentury in Yavana province. Till mid 20thcentury, there were 8000 christian priests in entire Yavana province. And they were married according to the Yavana tradition as that was the part of Brahmin tradition of India. Great poet Homer also mentioned about Elo who is highly influenced by Mahabharata.

No internal evidence of Alexander attack
There is no internal evidence of attack by Alexander on India. Seven year ago from the beginning of 19th century, priest William Zones wrote the story of Alexander and termed him the great for the first time citing Indica of Megasthenes. There is no evidence of that Indica. No poetry and write up mentions about Alexander coming to India.
Page 537-540 of Encyclopaedia Americana edited by Bernard mentions that Alexander (king of Makdunia) moved from Palla (Indian name) and reached Patal along Dajla Farat river and returned through Takshila through Makrana to Kabul. Because Alexander didn’t dare to enter into India listening about mighty power of military of India’s emperor Paurav Raj. Page 540 of part 1 of Encyclopaedia Americana says that military of Alexander considered moving forward from Hindukush worthless and Alexander knew that Sindhu is not river but a sea. Therefore it’s impossible for him to even think about conquering India. This story was written and spread.
Only Encyclopaedia Americana presented speeches of British priests as historical evidence that there had been great emperor Alexander. Earlier, the priests used to call Alexander Yavana commander. Later they started to call him Makdunia emperor.
The Indians are unaware of the fact that 700 years ago Alexander era, the entire Yavana was divided into 9 separate states. Out of which Sparta and Antika were the prominent ones, while Makdunia was the smallest state. It’s of 250 km long and 7 km wide. Therefore, it’s smaller than that of Gorakhpur or Gazipur district of Uttar Pradesh. The total population was around 1 lakh. Presently, population of Makdunia is around 21 lakh. It’s known as republica Makdunia.
Entire Yavana province including Makdunia was won by defeating Parsik king who was in really the king of India in 380 BC. It’s said that after his father’s death, Alexander waged war with Parsik military. Nobody knows the results of this war. Because, few days later, he returned entire region to the Parsik king.
Although, Alexander never moved Rome, Europe, America, Australia, but the Christian priests started to call him great after 2,200 years of his birth. He never dared to confront with his contemporary kings. He became king at the age of only 22 years and died after 11 years. After few days, the Shaka won Makdunia.
There were vast states in India those days. It’s matter of inferior complexity and coward to term Alexander touching boundary of India as his victory in the time of Maurya dynasty, Gupt dynasty etc. 

To be continue...