Country Requires a new revolution of thoughts and its importance

India got independence from British by sacrificing their huge number of martyrs. The condition of England got worsened post Word War II. In fact, it was India which defended military of England and France in that war, otherwise Germany would have defeated them. Britishers had started shivering due to Subhas Chandra Bose. They were apprehensive that Netaji might appear in new avatar to dethrone their regime. Therefore, they thought that before this, it would be better to transfer the regime in the hands of their loved ones to run the government. Therefore, it was called transfer of responsibility and later whosoever were ready to fulfil this responsibility as their agents started to call it as transfer of power. Meanwhile, due to affection, the indigenous Indian society failed to gauge nature of those who had learnt the London politics by making friendly terms with the Britishers. Later, they cheated the countrymen. 
They implemented previous rules and regulations of the British system in India. There was a system prevailed in half part of India till August 15, 1947. They reaped the befit from the great enthusiasm arising out of massive patriotism in the country. They convinced indigenous kings to be the part of federal India. However, they were ready to do so. They deceitfully snatched away the  rights given by the Britishers to the Indian rulers. The remaining 525 regional kingdoms (mostly Hindu states) had been enjoying these rights which were snatched away by new rulers. It was a sin of renouncing Indian knowledge tradition and society tradition. They didn't ponder over that how would rules and regulations of England suit the vast country like India. England is as small as Chhattisgarh. The Britishers were compelled to return home after 90 years. 
In fact, they got love and affection from Indians. Therefore, they thought that they would succeed in befooling the Indians. It's a proof of their ignorance.
India Act 1935 is the very basis of the Indian constitution which included several liberal arrangements upon which Indians can amend it. 
But Jawaharlal Nehru had inclined towards the Communist. Keeping the country in dark, he was ready to run the government in line with Soviet Union. He promoted the bureaucracy dependent on party leaders. For the first time, the ruling dispensation controlled all the rights and started to function. Moreover, the right to property (fundamental right) was also snatched away from the people. Apart from that, the misdeeds were rampant in the country. The English education was promoted. The ruling dispensation promoted the Christian missionaries. Education and communication system were in the government control. The state was considered as the owner of national property. The Indian kings never did so in the history. 
Moreover, no Indian ruler made a law according to the Indian tradition. The rulers used to understand social tradition, creed system religion and discipline. 
Various groups of Indian society themselves have been devising rules and regulations. The Indian society has been following the norms for thousands of years. All the groups used to give their consent during coronation. The ruling dispensation would guarantee to follow the norms and rituals. All these would happen in conducive atmosphere. That's why, the word king was used. Those who were educated, smart and beautiful were called kings. The word like king was not in use in India. Even Gandhi Jee didn't imagine the word like king. He had said that the Indians won't adopt it. But the Congress leaders set up a new kind of arrangement by turning down Gandhi Jee's suggestions. They accepted Gandhi Jee as their main leader but it was false. He took no inspiration from Gandhi Jee. He only used Gandhi Jee. Jawaharlal himself had said that the Congress had given no consent on Gandhi Jee's thoughts and the Congress working committee had passed no proposal seeking to validate his thoughts expressed by him in Hind Swaraj. Now question arises that is the constitution providing a universal democratic republic not true?
This very article was taken from US. But truth is that all the leaders were disciplined and patriotic during freedom struggle. They were in favour of a constitution promising for a welfare state. The constitution must be easy to amend. 
As chief of draft committee of the constitution Jawaharlal Nehru himself had said that the rules and regulations of the constitution would be changed with passage of time. The constitution must not be held responsible for the rampant problems in the country. 
It was the rules and regulations for running the government with a view to transfer the Britishers' responsibility taking inspiration from English education by some Indians. It  must be praised. But the Indian aborigines, sanatan religion follower or Hindu society are in view that the government must function with consent of all the stakeholders. It means that the government must function according to huge knowledge tradition and sanatan tradition. The government responsibility is to protect that rules and implement them. It was beyond imagine that some persons would devise rules and regulations for the government. The Britishers did so because they had no affection for Indians. It's clear that they made India Act 1935 given the interests of Britishers. 
The constitution makers were in view that it's unstable arrangement. Nehru Jee himself accepted this.
Due to Soviet Union's effect, he made many arrangements to reject the Indian traditions. They implemented the rules and regulations of many European countries specially England and US for the last 200 years. No matter their intention is to provide good governance. But it suited neither global aspects nor Indian traditions. 
The main thing is that he devised education rules devoid of Indian traditions. The government took control on education system in the country. The children were not imparted education as per Indian traditions. The Indians forgot that the country has a huge knowledge tradition in every fields like politics, sociology, religion, finance upon which the government has been running good governance for thousands of years.
Therefore, the educated persons started to believe that this system would remain in practice in coming years. It will be different from the Indian knowledge tradition. They started to float new political parties. That's why, no political party, which can preserve the Indian knowledge tradition, came to existence in the last 70 years. 
There was a group which was talking about democracy in the country. They have been fighting for power for the last 70 years. 
Whatever political parties are in India, are the part of that group. That's why, they focus on the ideology of the particular thinker. No political party claimed to adopt Indian knowledge tradition, while the states have always been favouring it. 
So, it's right time to float such political party which follow the rules and regulations of Indian knowledge tradition. It must declare that the state's duty will be to adopt and improve the Indian knowledge traditions.