Shankaracharya Ji Maharaj

   Many people including people from political parties on the occasion of the evolution of Bhagavatpad Shankaracharya was most on the manifestation festival of Maharaj, remembering him and described him as the great founder of national unity. Hearing this again and again, I was deeply shocked at first, then I thought that so many important people were saying this, they must be saying it with reverence, so I started searching in my library that mainly Gandhiji, Nehruji and prominent Congress leaders and prominent What are the views of the BJP leaders about Bhagvatpad Shankaracharya Ji Maharaj and even more so started searching what are the views of these people on national unity. Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay ji has definitely written a book on Shankaracharya among the prominent kings and he has told the real basis of national unity to Sanatan Dharma. Earlier Sri Aurobindo, who after being active in national politics moved towards his natural direction of yoga and higher thinking, has explained in great detail and in a very scholarly and authentic manner that Sanatan Dharma is the essence of the nation of India, essence and that's the basic premise.
But no other Rajpurush has written anything like this in the last 100 years. No one has ever mentioned in any election manifesto that they are calling this "Sanatan Nation" dialectical materialism (which they call socialism) by the communist faction of Congress vehemently opposes being employed forcibly) and declares that they will re-establish Sanatan Dharma in India.
Even till today not a single national party has said that the religion of the majority of India has been completely neglected at the state level by the Congress killing the basic spirit and vision of the Constitution and destroying that religion. Special protection has been given to the sects who make public declaration night and day, that is against the basic spirit of the constitution and therefore we will definitely give at least the same protection to Hindu religion as Congress, Islam and Congress if we come to power. Has started giving to the religion and religion called Christianity. Whereas this arrangement can be done by adding only one provision in Article 25 and 26 of Part III of the Constitution or Article 38 or 39 of Part IV. For example, in Article 38(1), where it is said that the State shall inspire and effectively establish and protect all institutions of national life for the promotion of public welfare, social, economic and political, there is a political Adding only one word 'religious' or 'spiritual' will do this work and in its explanation or explanation it can be mentioned that the Government of India will give the same protection to Hindu religion as it gives to the religion and religion of the minorities. But even such a small effort has not been made till date.
Therefore, it is clear that no party in India has any idea of doing justice with Sanatan Dharma i.e. with the followers of Sanatan Dharma i.e. with Hindus in religious and spiritual matters. It is well known that all kinds of justice political, economic and social can be the result of justice related to religion and spirituality, not otherwise. Therefore, whatever the spirit of national unity may be of political parties, there is no talk of justice with Hindus and with Hindu religion. What then does he mean by national unity and what is its relation to the life and philosophy of Param Pujya Shankaracharya? It is understandable.
On reading, it seems that the meaning of national unity of all of them is that the government treasury of Islam woman, in which more than 85 percent the contribution is of Hindus, the policy of all parties to give unjustified and basically illegal financial grants, donations and cooperation, they call it the policy of national unity. Along with this, all the parties in India discriminate and discriminate among the citizens of India on communal lines. They say that it is the duty of the Government of India to see that the religious life of Hindus remains as it is, but the life of Muslims and Christians is governed by their religious loyalty and devotion, and for this the government keeps spending a substantial part of the treasury. Although the Congress etc. worked systematically and systematically at the level of government to make Hindus atheist, materialistic, religious and anti-religious and anti-religious and made all policies of education and culture in the same way. There is ample public evidence of this. There is abundant evidence of this on the website of the Ministries of Education and Culture itself.
Thus the rulers of India have been openly discriminatory and biased towards the religious life of the citizens. They have been doing systematic work to convert the majority of citizens to religion and have been funding the minorities for their religious allegiance.

"Brahma is the soul, he is also the whole world. The world is not an independent entity other than Brahman, which is only disciplined from Brahman, but independent in the form of being. The living entity is also not an independent entity other than Brahman. He is Brahma."

   It is not understood that with what views of Bhagvatpad Shankaracharya Ji Maharaj these government policies are related or what is this strange concept of national unity, on which the rulers of India have ruled in the country for the last 75 years. This is the situation that during Congress rule the workers of Congress and Communist Parties become upset and excited and they force to seek apology or get punished. At least in the BJP rule we are able to express our views.
But regarding this subject the most important thing is that first of all Bhagwatapad Shanakarachrya Ji Maharaj views should be remembered in brief and then it is seen that if it has any concern with the national unity? It is straight but far away? Does it says something important? Or it is any simple political view point? The foundation of Adwait of Shankaracharya is Dwait.
The understanding of the related subject is as follows:
Brahma Satyam, Jaganmithya. Jivo brahmaiva naparah.
1. Brahma is the living beings and only this is the whole world. There is no other existing power which is disciplined by the God or Brahma but has got to be independent and free. Even Jeev is also not so free. It is Brahma. This situation is the situation of salvation. Brahma is second to none. (Shruti)
    Scientists investigate the basic nature of matter. First he found that the molecule is the basic substance. 

Then the atom was discovered. Electrons, protons and neutrons were discovered. Then it was discovered that wave particles are the root. In the course of the discovery of elementary matter, photons were also discovered, which are wave particles, i.e., having two-level behavior. These discoveries took place in the 20th century AD, based on Einstein's theory of relativity and Max Planck's principles of physics. Now if a scientist is teaching in a high level science class, then he takes a block of any substance in his hand and says that it is not really a lump of earth or a piece of stone or a piece of iron, it is a wave. There is an association of granules. Basically it is the same. This does not mean that the scientist does not accept the direct and concrete existence of matter. He does not walk on the ground or sit on a chair, table or deal with laboratory objects. It only scatters the wave granules. It's not like this. He knows the direct existence of matter. But he also knows their fundamental and subtle elements and therefore he can say to the right person that what he sees is not true, it is only relative. Essentially it is a collision of wave particles.
    From this example you can understand the truth of the supreme being of Brahman and the practical being of the living entity and the world. such creatures and the world is occult, false and practical truth. Brahma is the ultimate truth.
2.    The level and form of its realization and its manifestation, which is the Absolute Truth, is determined by the level of consciousness and the experience and realization generated by spiritual practice. Even if the Sun is visible to three people and appears in the same form, they will still describe it according to their own structure of consciousness and the training and experience they have received from language. In such a situation, one can call it the great Jyotipunj or Alokpunj, some may call it Lord Bhuvan Bhaskar, one may also call it Brahmaswaroop Shri Suryanarayana, may be described by different names like Mitra, Khag, Bhaskar, Savita, Ravi, Surya etc. could. Advaita description, duality description and trait description of the Supreme Being are such descriptions. They express the same supreme knowledge in different terms. The living entity, the world and the all-pervading Supreme Being are manifest. Therefore, at that level, the trait philosophy is a direct truth. The duality of Jiva and Brahman is a different kind of philosophy and to see the same Supreme Being everywhere is another level of philosophy and truth. These are literally three different styles of describing the same core understanding. Because never any great Indian philosopher has said that only the world is true, that there is no Jiva and Brahman, or there is only Brahman, the living entities and the world which are visible, they do not exist at any level or the soul is related to Brahman. There is no other independent power. It is clear from this that basically all are seeing and accepting the right existence of these three and are discussing them in detail. At the same time, all Indian philosophers have also said with one voice that the ultimate truth is beyond the imperceptible of both speech and mind. Because the same is said in the Upanishads also. Therefore the mind and speech it is beyond, how can it be adequately and accurately described in speech? This is impossible. Therefore, the ultimate truth cannot be described, but direct knowledge can be attained through yoga.

"The living entity, the world and the all-pervading Supreme Being are manifest. Therefore, at that level, the trait philosophy is a direct truth. The duality of Jiva and Brahman is a different kind of philosophy and to see the same Supreme Being everywhere is another level of philosophy and truth."
3.    Then what are three or four or five different types of descriptions? They are games of intelligence. Intelligence is a part of exercise. So that the intellect is subtle and sharp and is able to know the deep truth.
    The great masters of India wrote commentaries on Prasthanatrayi for the curious and deserving disciples. These are the commentaries of the Acharyas, that is, they are for the people who have studied up to a certain level. Like the basic principles of physics or the principles of higher mathematics, the formulas or the basic laws of engineering or the study of medicine is for the knowledgeable people. If illiterate people who are unaware of the subject discuss them, then only humor is possible.
    These Acharyas knew that the essence of the knowledge of the Vedas reaches all the enlightened people through the guidance given in the Yagya-Yoga-Festival-Organizations of the great sannyasis, from the story-tellers of the epics-puranas etc. Familiar with things. The commentary is meant to bring more subtlety and depth to that information, so that the speed of understanding becomes faster and the power becomes wider. The refutation-mandanan of classical discourse is also a part of this excellent meritocracy or meritocracy exercise. Because ultimately realization is to be achieved by every seeker himself, he has to become self-luminous, he has to become the soul-jyoti. This is not a commentary made for the promotion of any cult in the secular sense. The context of cults is social, not cognitive. They keep on being accepted by those with a favorable state of mind with distinction of eligibility, rights and distinctions. Creed-variety, vision-variety, level-differentiation, this is the reality of the world. No one religion is for the whole world. To desire that the sect or sect or view or belief known to me or dear to me is the only view or sect or opinion for the whole world or that it should be acceptable to all, this desire is also a ridiculous condition of competition with the Supreme Being which has ruled at all levels. But this diverse world has been created.
    Our best sages, the rendering-distinctions that exist among the various Acharyas, are the presentations of the same ultimate truth through style-differentiation and phraseo-distinction. The disciple should accept whatever rendering according to his sanskar and state of mind, but he should not disobey or ridicule any other rendering before becoming himself visible. If your beloved teacher has made any refutation in strong words, then consider it worthy of consideration, but this meditation keep in mind that the basic proposition is self-knowledge and Brahma-knowledge, the refutation of the opinion of other Indian masters is to be entangled in worldly passions, etc., before attaining accomplishment.
4.    Now the question arises that why did the priests come to India and consider the philosophical views here to be mutually different sects? The only appendage of this would be the question that why the Indian disciples of those undeveloped and idiotic clergy are treating those views as very different sects, even different political sects. The answer to this appendage question is simple that they are less talented, less capable of intellectual effort and foolish. Now the original question is debatable.
    Enthusiastic, hard-working, defiant European soul-searchers, devoid of Sanskrit knowledge tradition and devoid of any knowledge-tradition for centuries, spread lies, forgery and ridiculous propaganda wherever they went. Their hard work can be appreciated. But any system which presents it as proof, in the name of education, after 1947 AD, it is a sin, adharma, and injustice to be imposed across India. It is foolish to mention that ignorance and unrighteousness in a valid sense in the context of education. So there is no need to solve them. They are just meaningless guesses. It is right to remember this much.
    One should understand the extent and problem of the manic workers from the greediness and cravings of those clergy and from the impoverished and impoverished homes of the East India Company. Most of them were from very poor background and had not read much other than the Bible. So were illiterate and hence driven by frenzy and impulsiveness. In the mad zeal of making everyone Christian, he heard from the people and wrote anything by putting his crooked intellect in it. The frenzy of those poor people is evident in him. But what longings and what people's frenzy do the devoted Hindu disciples follow in their pursuit? This should be understood.
    Then it is also that in their own countries they formed dozens of sects of the same origin Christianity on the basis of similar minor differences and each of them used to fight bloody fights with other sects, burn their settlements and commit horrific atrocities. The bloody fights of sects like Catholic, Protestant, Lutheran, Orthodox etc. are a world-known part of European history. That is why by propagating the differences of Advaita philosophy, Dvaita philosophy, Trait philosophy, etc., he was wishing to spread bloody conflicts among Hindus here too. In this way their boundaries are clear and those who follow them and work hard like slaves in the same clergy and pauper establishments, research and research of universities. The intellectual poverty and humility of the people who spend their lives in seminars is also attested. But the main concern is something else.
5.    The omnipresent Supreme Being is elementless. This is the waste. It cannot be spent or destroyed. This is what is said in the famous mantra 'Purnamadah Purnamidam'. Because out of that which is omnipresent, for whom and why? Expenditure is always done by someone for someone who is a thing or person outside the spender. There is nothing outside that which is omnipresent. Hence its expenditure is not possible. In the same way the destroyer is also other than the one being destroyed. There is nothing other than that which is omnipresent. Therefore its destruction is not possible. This is the ultimate truth.
6.    What is false then? That which is perishable is unreal. Therefore there is an end, there is Maya. The whole field, including nature and distortion, is unreal. The attitudes of the inner being, the perception of self-consciousness, etc. are all Kshetra or Dharma of Kshetra. All the realms are asat i.e. there is no ultimate truth. The Kshetrajna is the ultimate truth. Here 'Asat' is a definitional philosophical term, which does not mean untrue, but that which appears to be changeable and perishable, is unreal before or relative to the Supreme Being, even if it is only its appearance.
7.    From Brahma to the pillar, who are seen to be divided by many body-shaped titles, they are the form of the Supreme Being, beyond thte distinction of all the titles. This is a transcendental understanding truehat realization cannot be attained by the realization of false words.
8.    The world is action, Brahman is the cause. The world in action is 'is', but in causality it is not. This is the spiritual condition. which is indescribable. But it is directly perceptible. It has been said that the world has a practical existence, Brahman has a transcendental existence. The world is false, that is, there is no ultimate reality.
9.    Brahman is not attainable. He is always perfect. Its non-attainment is due to ignorance, avidya, self-forgetfulness. Acquisition comes through knowledge. Only that attainment comes from knowledge. It is only the accomplishment of the Siddha. Merely the cover of ignorance is destroyed. In essence, there is no origin of ignorance, there is no cessation, there is no bondage to it, no one is bound. Salvation is not an entirely new attainment. It is attainment. Falsehood is eradicated. Ignorance has to be destroyed.
10.    Avyakta Prakriti, Mahatattva, Samashti-ego, the Tanmatras of the five great beings, the five sense organs, the five sense organs, the five sense objects - words, touch, form, taste, smell and 24 are the mind. These are the 24 elements. They have practical power. They do not have supernatural power. From the point of view of Paramarth, they are unreal, they are psychic reals. These are the areas. Their fielder is Brahma. Brahma is their abode. They are absorbed in Brahman. The virtues of the addict do not come in the establishment. In practice these are qualities, because they are actually in the habit. But ultimately they are psychic, perishable, changeable, unreal. To accept them as the ultimate truth is bondage. The bond is essentially not. In Brahman, there is no bondage in the soul. The knowledge of bondage, the feeling of bondage is false because it is not there in reality. On seeing the soul, the bondage becomes invisible. False feeling vanishes. False knowledge is dispelled. The realization of the world in Brahman is aadhyas. The realization of the field in the soul or in the fielder is aadhyas.

Then what is the limit of this knowledge? Because it has been said that even people who know the Vedas are not able to get rid of any restriction. We are all manifestations of Brahman and Brahma realization should be spontaneous. But his own desires are the restrictors in him. four types of restrictions are obstacles to rise-
1 Vyāsāsakti, 2 Retardation of the intellect, 3 Autism and 4 Viparyāya (i.e. opposite knowledge) - Pratibandho presento viāsāktlkh.
Pratibandho Vartmano Vishyasaktilakshanah I
Pragyamandyam Kutarkashcha Viparyayaduragrahah II43II
(Panchadasi, Dhyandeepprakaranam (Chapter 9) Verse 43)
It is clear that this is a very subtle and deep level of knowledge. Such subtlety is impossible in ordinary life and is not even seen. Its abstract and simplified form has always been widespread in India through Puranas and mythology etc.
(To continue...)