Newly Educated Hindus’ Basic Problems Regarding Indian History- Reference (Babar)

   What are the basic problems of newly educated Hindus regarding Indian History? It needs to be understood. In this regard, first of all it needs to be known that the subject which is called history in India is yet to be written in European and Muslim countries. Reason behind it is that there is no tradition of study in the Christianity and Islam. This is such a simple and easy truth that those Hindus who are addicted to watching things in complexity and have great respect for scriptures have no belief in this truth. They are unable to understand it.
Great historian and social scientist Prof Kusumlata Kedia Jee has made it clear many times but at the same time newly educated Hindus fail to understand it. The fact is that there is no tradition of study in the Christianity and the Islam. Whatever has been written in the name of history, is nothing but agenda based political propaganda. In the greed of attaining power, they decide political agenda and write for propaganda of the same agenda. All Europeans are well aware of it. But at the same time, newly educated Indians don’t know this fact. 
The Muslim and the Christian writers have different views over agenda based political propaganda. After the renaissance and introduction of the world, the intellectual Europeans have worked hard while keeping their political agenda in mind. At the same time, they were not critical to the church. India has been witnessing a great study tradition. Hard work should be praised. Because, in India, merits and demerits of even demons, dacoits and monsters are discussed equally. This is the basic Indian tradition which is not in the memory of newly educated people in the society. The church has imparted training of suffering to the followers in the name of khrist sect. The Europeans are hard working people due to climate and lack of diversity of food grains and fruits. Therefore, hard labor and suffering get inculcated in their genes and in the DNA as per Bhagwat Jee. That’s why, they worked hard and deceived in writing due to insane refinement of khrist sect. We have been providing enough evidences in this regard. But here, we would like to mention that evidence which has been cited by Prof Kusumlata Kedia repeatedly. 
The Europeans had known nothing in this regard by 17th century. Whatever they knew by 18th century, wrote with a khrist approach and highly insanity. They started acquiring good knowledge due to hard work in the 19th century. By 20th century, their knowledge started to become significant. Despite their limitations, they started conversations with ancient people in the world, got their stuff translated in various languages and put their input in them. They tried to prove their distorted, corrupt and false write ups as evidence in the world. They succeeded in countries like India, while they failed in India. The reasons behind success in India are that they took advantage of the coincidence of war and they transferred power to their followers in India. Therefore, the people started to term their false write ups as authentic. It’s not so that Jawaharlal Nehru was their follower. Treating Nehru as their follower is false. Nehru was a highly clever and ambitious politician who had understood the importance of nation state in the contemporary world. He was well aware of mischievous and coercive actions of politicians to grab nation states in the world. He knew that coercive action in India might boomerang due to caste-system, khap panchayat, warrior Hindu’s respect towards temples and ancient democratic tradition. That’s why he started a monopoly in the name of education given the Indians’ reverence. He hypnotized the people. It’s worth remembering that no political leader is as dynamic as Nehru in the last 75 years in the country. Shri Narendra Modi himself is following the style of functioning of Nehru. The basic difference between both of them is that a major part of the country was enveloped with socialism in the Nehruvian era, while presently the major part of the country is filled with the sense of Hinduism and Indianness. If we compare both of them, Modi is not at par with Nehru in this regard. Because Nehru took advantage of the socialistic atmosphere and imposed garbage on socialism in India. Modi himself gained popularity in the country. It is Hindus who made Modi as a dynamic leader due to their cultural and political needs. He is hesitating to take advantage in the favour of Hindus at international platforms. Although, it has a bright future in the days to come. Because, the future is for Hinduism. Western Europeans worked hard deceitfully to control nation states in various issues. They formed many international institutions in this regard. They have been granting students scholarships which have engulfed the entire world. Therefore, free consciousness may appear in the mind of newly educated Hindus towards European thoughts when either Modi Jee or other wise and competent politicians may do hard work in this regard.
On the other hand, whatever have been written for political propaganda in the Muslim communities, are the replica of propaganda of Europeans. Only unconscious people can believe that. 
Let’s see both the issues in light of Babar. Nothing was written about Babar and during his regime in the world. East India Company worker Henry Mayars Elliot (19) visited Bareilly as Personal Assistant of Collector (Revenue Collector) in 1826. He was the third child of a church worker John Elliot who had 15 children. Henry Mayars Elliot worked as an assistant here at Bareilly and Moradabad. He prepared a list of main words uttered by Rajputs and Brahmans for the convenience of workers. Both the Rajputs and Brahmans were dominating the area. It was essential to understand their language. 
Later, workers of the company had told that Hindu workers of Bengal worked in the company due to atrocity and poverty but at the same time they continued to extol their Hindu kings and queens. Particularly, Queen Bhavani who got constructed temples at Tarapeeth and Kashi and performed many yagya. Queen Rashmani got a ransom demanded by the company from fishermen of Bengal. She was instrumental behind the restoration of their livelihood. However, she was charged with breaching peace in Bengal. Rashmani belonged to the Kaivart caste. She engaged ShriramkrishnaParamhans as priest. She got constructed temples at Dakshineshwar, Babughat and Nimtalla at the bank of Ganga in Kolkata. She also got constructed road from Swarnrekha river to Puri. Many heavy boats and ships were functional with her support. She also got constructed bridge on the Ganga river. She also helped 2000 Hindus get rid of clutches from Dhaka Nawab. She also provided land for construction of the National Library and Hindu college at Kolkata. She donated to many temples in Kashi. She also renovated Shankaracharya Temple at Shrinagar and did many divine works. Hindu workers working in the company extolled such great kings and queens. Therefore, other workers of the company got suppressed. That’s why, they started to plant stories of Muslims beating and defeating Hindus. With this commitment, Henry Mayars Elliot started to write for the company and created many false stories due to unavailability of enough materials including Babarnama, which we will describe in the next issue.
Question arises that the people read the history written by separatist Muslims and traitor communists during congress regime in the last 75 years instead of works done by Queen Bhavani and Rashmani among other great kings of Bengal. When they write the success story of Babar on the basis of Henry Elliot and John Dowson and their Indian disciples, it reflects nothing but the insane intellectual life of the common Indians. 
Henry Mayars Elliot prepared dynasties of Brahmans and Rajputs with phraseology in Bareilly and Moradabad regions. It was published in 1845 and republished in 1860. He also started to prepare a list of ‘231 Muslim historians of Mohammadan India’. This list had no Indian Muslim writer. All the writers were either Arabic or Persian. Importantly, the writers were unknown in their respective areas. Clearly, the foreigners were indulging in creating false historical incidents. The great scientists made many inventions through their hard work in the field of science after coming in contact with the developed civilization of the world including India. However, there was no truth and diverse factual approach in the church and politics. In fact, scientists, church and politicians continued to confront each other in Europe. Later, they turned users and consumers of scientists who were exploited. The people were astonished at scientific inventions. Therefore, people of church and politicians started to term their own stories as inventions. Therefore, people started inventing in human studies. It means that people started indulging in concocted stories, gossip, planning and their propaganda. 
Simple workers of the company extolled Mohammad historians in India, giving a new lease of life to the Muslim propagandists who started to translate them into Urdu and Persian. Babarnama is an invention and propaganda which was found by Henry Mayars Elliot. The Muslim intellectuals translated it and put it into the libraries during Congress regime. Therefore, drama like ‘dhummacha de’ was started in the field of Mohammedan history. 
The so-called autobiography of Babar was found for the first time in 1915 in England in the translation of Turkish language. Its classification in the library was –‘Hyderabad Codex’. But no such manuscript was found in Hyderabad, meaning Tipu Sultan library in Hyderabad. It was never found in the libraries of Agra, Delhi, Lahore, Karachi, Kabul, Kandhar, Uzbekistan, etc. It was said that no such translation was done in 1589 during the Akbar regime. Because the so-called book was in Chagatai language. It was also said that many parts of those pieces of translation were found to be missing. Many pages of that book were torn. It was also said that many atrocities were mentioned in that part of the book. 
Ene Susan Bevarij has translated the book, according to which, the main manuscript was torn. It mentioned no date of birth of Babar. Later, Haider Mirza claimed to possess the lost information. 
Meanwhile, in her introduction, the writer says that Zahir-Uddin-Mohammad was later known as Babar. Whose mother Kut-Luk-Nigah was an educated lady. She was well versed with the Quran. But at the same time, it was said that Zahir-Uddin-Mohammad neither saw nor read the Quran. All the writers are unanimous on this subject. The writer says that the mother taught Babar Turkish and Persian language, while all the prominent writers are of view that he was familiar with only Chagatai language.
The writer has also cited a book Zafarnama which was written by Al-Din-Al-Yazdi in 15th century on the order of Ibrahim Sultan. Timur was in the later part of 14th century. Chagatai Khan belonged to sanatandharmi clan in which Taimur took birth. He won over Khurasan to Bagdad. He butchered around two crores Muslim. He defeated the Usman dynasty of Turkey. Later, he confronted the Genghis Khan dynasty. Later, he adopted another culture for reflecting himself differently. It’s worth mentioning that Chagatai was the name of Genghis Khan. People belonging to Phargana were called Chagatai dynasty. Genghis Khan had many wives and kept women. He gave birth to many sons. Genghis Khan had married a girl named Borate (10) who herself belonged to Tatar dynasty. Later, Borate was abducted. Genghis Khan butchered many people for getting her back from the clutches of them. Borate gave birth to a son, Jochi. Later, he also gave birth to three children namely Chagatai, Ogadei and Tolai. Genghis Khan also gave birth to many children from other wives. Borate also gave birth to many daughters. Genghis Khan’s son Ugadai married his father’s kept woman Moge Khatun after the latter's demise. Genghis Khan was sanatandharmi. He used to give respect to the Buddhas. Genghis Khan’s distant brother was Karchar Noyan whose son was Ichil. Ichil’s son was Alangir. Alangir’s son was Burgul Noyan. Burgul Noyan’s son was Targai Noyan. Targai Noyan’s son was Timur. Therefore, Timur is great grandchild of great grandchild of brother of Genghis Khan. It remains unclear the relation between Timur and Babar. Since he took birth in the Chagatai dynasty, therefore he was called Chagatai Turk. But at the same time, Chagatai himself was a sanatandharmi person and a Buddhist. It remains unclear the date of Chagatai of Khurasan becoming Muslim. It’s yet to be known whether he became Muslim or not. All the people are anticipating it. Because, Babar had no knowledge of either Quran or Islam. After many years, he was termed as Muslim. But many people converted to Muslims in that region. That’s why, people anticipate on this basis. Although only Hun, Kushan and Shaka used to reside there in Pharagana. Turk is a part of Hun. Apart from it, Tajik and Turkman are in majority in that region. 
Uzbek Khan belonged to sanatandharmi khan. It’s said that he adopted Islam at any point of time. But that region was named Uzbekistan in the 17th century. During the Babar era, that region was a part of India. It had been an inherent part of India since the Mahabharata period to 17th century. The Britishers themselves used to call it as part of India. For the first time in 1917, the Stalin-led Communist Party took control over that part and made it a separate province. Few years ago, it became a free nation state.