Panthnirpeskhta Vs Secularism (Dharmanirpekshta)

 Communication medium is deliberately disseminating false facts of some English words among a particular class in India. Secularism is such word which is portrayed as dharmnirpekshta through communication medium wrongly in a particular class. It aims at misguide religious Hindu citizens which is an offence according to IPC.

References have to be known for getting truth because this very word has been taken from Europe. Its root is in Europe.

Europe had remained under the influence of Christianity for 1000 years. They described it as 2000 years. The unbiased scholars themselves have written this truth. Reference of a book is enough in this regard. Norman Richard Devis is an honest Christian and an authentic scholar. He studied in the countries like England, France and Italy. His book ‘Europe: A History’ is famous. In a chart in the page number 1236, he has written that the Christianity had entered Europe in seventh century. It entered  Germany in eighth century and Russia, Poland, Serbia and Bulgaria in 10th century. It made foray in Norbey, Sweden, Finland in 11th, 12th, 13th century respectively. It spread in every country through violence. Then in 16th century, it faced massive opposition. Therefore, Europe had remained under influence of Christianity for 1000 years. In many countries, it had influenced for 400 years. Therefore, Europe is under Christian impact, while the Science has also made great effect on the intellectual class there.

The question will arise in the mind of readers that how the Hindu Religion means Sanatan Religion remained in practice for lakhs of years in India which has been bigger in size in every country of Europe. Why did the Christianity not spread in Europe and why is it marginalized? It’s an important question.
The reason behind it is that the Christianity is monotheist. It means that it considers only one path of feeling of the ultimate goal. The impact of this violent thought is that panthik violence increases in the matavad followers too and everybody has its own definition. Because, it’s totally opposite to the fundamental rule of existence ‘vaividhya’. Then every sub cult gets intolerant violently.

It happened in every country of Europe. Catholic and Prostate and Eastern Church have different views. One sub cult started to kill each other. Kalvinvadi, Jesuit seventh day adventurist started to scuffle with each other. Every cult started to say that only its own Christian sect can be alive in its state. Some laws were devised that the protestant can beat Catholic with chabuk whenever they want to. Highly violent laws were made and they are not necessary to be mentioned here. Lastly in the end of 17th century, some intellectuals started to say that this violent act must be stopped. Separate discussion had been held for 150 years at different places. At last, in 20th century, the use of secularism increased. But even today, secularism has more opponents.

The fundamental fact is that secularism has been used in the world to check scuffle among the Christians. Apart from it, the important fact is that no state has been called secular in the constitution of countries like England, France, Germany, Norvey, USA, Netherland, Denmark, Spain, Portuguese, Sweden, Switzerland, Japan, China, Russia, Vietnam, Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. No country out of which link secularism with its state. But majority of people in India are unable to know this fact due to ignorance. Some smaller states have declared themselves as secular, but many bigger states are either Christian or Muslims. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Arab, Oman, Kuwait, Jordon, Morocco, etc are the Muslim countries. Majority of Hindu don’t know it. All these Muslim countries declare that only ‘Allah’ is revered. And the entire world belongs to the Allah. And the last predecessor of Allah is the Prophet Muhammad. Therefore, the Muslims own the entire land and we will continue to work for it. Almost all the Muslim countries declare it in their constitution.

The Christian countries too used to declare that the Christians can use entire land. Now they changed their language. Now they talk about humanity but many Christian parties are active in every Christian country. They disseminate their ideology in the world. No famous Christian country is secular. But Christian cult is its official religion according to which the education and justice are imparted to the people.

Therefore, during emergency in India, the communists added the word secularism as adjective to the state. It should give special meaning. India is not a Christian state, therefore, there is meaning of Christianity. But honourable MP has not defined secularism clearly. Although, the honourable MP has right to define it and present it in black and white. We would like to draw your attention towards the most important facts:

Franko Maria Aaro Voltare opposed Christianity vehemently in 18th century and said that the ultimate god is known only through intellect instead of faith in the Christianity. The Christian God is a concept against the intellect. The Christian priests and kings have no right to control people’s personal spiritual thoughts. Voltaire supported new scientists and opposed the churches.

Thomas Jefferson opposed the particular cult of Christianity in 19th century. He said that the state must look after the working of the people instead of controlling their thought. Therefore, the USA must not have a national church because it will give pain to the Christians having faith in other churches.

The Christian scholars used the word secularism in political context for the first time in 20th century. They said that the state will support and provide shelter to no religion.      

According to some other scholars, the state must be limited to materialistic issues. It’s unjustifiable to take interest in religious issues.

It was also termed as oppose of anticlericalism.

Secularism has no such meaning in India.

Here, secularism means ignorance of Hindu religion by state and providing government subsidy to the religious education for Islam and Christianity. There is no such meaning in the entire world. It’s Hindus who deposit maximum government tax. 

Moreover, some people have given the Hindi word dharmanirpeksh which is totally wrong. Because, entry of word religion is entirely different in the English dictionary. It means that the global rules are universal among the Hindu and Buddhist religions. There is separate meaning of the word religion. It means that having faith in a particular cult proponent. Therefore, Islam and Christianity are religion not the dharm. The Hindu dharm is not the religion, it’s dharm. Today, the entire world knows it. Therefore, dharnirpekshta is filthy word because it’s bad habit.

In the authentic translation of the constitution, secularism is written as ‘panth nirpekshta’ and the honourable MP has passed it. Therefore, saying it dharm nirpekshta is totally unconstitutional. The state will support no particular cult, it’s called panth nirpekshta. But in India, in the name of sheltering the minority, the government provides due shelter to the religion. It’s an unconstitutional. The state should remain panth nirpeksh. 

(In the next issues, sarvapanth sammelan or sarvadharm sammelan)