Objectives of freedom

We must understand that whatever is said freedom (swadhinta) in Hindi is termed as freedom (azadi) in Urdu. It’s not a universal human objective. Only slave people or society aims at freedom. Around 85 percent to 95 percent people of Europe were slave during medieval period of Christianity for thousands of years. Therefore, freedom became a great objective for them. Now in Europe, no state aims at freedom. Only prosperity, expansion, etc are their objectives. England has no written constitution. But traditionally, they aim at sheltering and expanding majority society cult ‘Prostate Christianity’.  In US, the states aim at justice and safety, internal security and peace and freedom of citizens. In Pakistan, the states aim at that it’s Allah who is sovereign in the entire world and Pakistani people will consider the quran dictum as the source of rights. Therefore, they want to maintain democracy, equality and justice among the Muslim groups. Afghanistan states also have the similar objectives. In Bangladesh, the state begins its objectives with ‘Bismillah ur Rahman ar Rahim’. Indian states aim at national unity, friendship, brotherhood, social, economical, political justice, thought, expression, belief, religion, freedom of worshiping and job opportunity in the society. Their objectives are to keep democratic republic in the country.
In India, when the revolutionaries showed the rebellion against the English, their language was to kill enemies. According to them, the English tried to commit sin in India by establishing rule in the guise of trade. They tried to ruin sanatan religion in India. They were foreigner. There is no harm to kill them. Therefore, we kill them. Similarly, whatever peaceful movement was run, mentioned no freedom. Gandhijee in his speech in 1940 had said only about self governance. The British rule is bad, terror, etc. We need self governance. Lokmanya Tilak declared that ‘Good governance is our birth right’. He himself aimed at self governance means our own rule.
Lokmanya Tilak who wrote ‘Bhagwad Gita Rahasya’ aimed at bringing self governance. He had nothing to do with caste, creed and colour of the rulers. According to him, the governance must depend on Indian knowledge tradition and religion tradition.
The educated people who gained education at London launched peaceful movements learned to use the world ‘independence’. They raised the issue of independence which meant that India depended on England which must be eradicated and India must be controlled through its own policies made by Indians. Later, the word ‘freedom’ came into existence. This word has been given importance in entire Europe which has been under slave for thousands of years. The people aimed at get emancipated from terror of churches. Therefore, the word ‘freedom’ hogged the limelight.
Majority of people in India are not aware that this word was used for freedom from sin committed by priests of churches. Because, husband and wife were directed to meet on certain days as per the priests. They started to demand freedom from that sin.
The priests used to control even emotion of husband and wife. The women would have to confess in the church. They would have to confess that whatever thoughts erupt in their minds while meeting with their husbands. The women have to tell all these things to the unmarried priests. This resulted into various sins. The intellectual society started demanded freedom from sin committed by the priests. They demanded that the couple could have sex easily. For the first time they aimed at bringing freedom in true sense. They fought big fight in this direction.
Later, massive pageant revolution erupted everywhere in the countries like England, France, etc, because the landlords made farmers as slave. They had no right to own their fields. After acquiring worldly knowledge and other traditions, they demanded renaissance means recreation of ancient culture before Christianity. Due to movements, the churches were forced to become liberal.
Meanwhile, many people visited other countries and started to deceive their citizens to dominate them. Later, people migrated from England and Europe to US started to demand freedom and attained it.
In Europe, freedom means getting emancipation from churches in sexual affairs of couple. Other meaning is that majority’s freedom from minority.
There is no demand of freedom from Islam in the Muslim countries. While, the Christians started to demand freedom from churches. Earlier, all the rights were vested with priests and rulers. Freedom had special reference there.
Therefore, the people who went to England to study started to demand freedom. In Urdu, it was termed azadi, while in Hindi, it was called swadhinta. Some people started to term it emancipation which has no meaning in English. There is word ‘salvation’ which has special Christian reference in English. The meaning of salvation is that all the living things will remain in peaceful state in the funeral for thousands of years. Then, there will be a day of ‘last judgment’ when servant of the god will blow turhi.
Then all the souls will appear before the god. Priests debated that in which attire they will appear before the god? Al last, it was said that the in the same attire in which they were buried in funeral they will appear before the god after thousands of years. Jesus Christ will also stand by them. Because, he is the sole son of the god who has given birth to only son so far. The Jesus will indicate towards those persons will attain salvation. The remaining people will be sent to the hell despite being well mannered, true and religious. According to illiterate Hindu, salvation means emancipation. Earlier, it was the priests who compiled the dictionary of Indian language. They mentioned meaning of god as brahma or god. Religion means dharma and salvation means emancipation. It has no reference with India where emancipation means true knowledge of their own form and original self knowledge is known as emancipation in India. Therefore, emancipation has nothing to do with salvation. Without knowing that, ideological and intellectual anarchy were spread in India.
The Indian Constitution has mentioned the word freedom. The article 19 of the constitution provides freedom of speech expression, peaceful assembling, movement, residing, etc to the people of India. It also provides or trade and business. All these rights are under the state safety, relation with foreign counties, peaceful arrangement, public system, decency and morality. No citizen has right to encroach with sovereignty and unity of India. It has been clearly mentioned in the constitution.
It’s worth mentioning that provision of freedom was mentioned in India Act, 1935 because then England was controlling the Indians. The English demanded the preparation of the constitution for rule transfer. Therefore, on the basis of India Act 1935-K, the scholars tried to present a noble constitution. Certainly, they included the provision of freedom in the constitution. Indian religious scriptures give other meaning of freedom in social aspect. Providing freedom in the society is considered as bad. Therefore, the women and children must not give freedom means they should be given protection.
In that condition, the meaning of freedom is to give no shelter. You are free means you have no guardian, patron to look after you. It means you yourself have to protect.
But the state must provide freedom because the England states were telling that we are controlling you in every aspect of life, instead we are providing some freedom under morality. Our constitution provides meaning that the state has sovereign and strength. It controls the life the citizens. Therefore, the state gives freedom to its citizen under the sovereignty. It’s the meaning of freedom. The system provides limited freedom to the people under the limitation of national unity.
Unfortunately, socialist faction started to dominate Indian National Congress to some extent. It considered Soviet Union as ideal and launched the movement to ruin Indian consciousness and sanatan knowledge tradition. They appointed such people who had enmity with Indian knowledge tradition and judicial tradition to the various important posts and protected them. Therefore, they declared Hindu religion instead of state which is the false because the ruling dispensation has nothing to do with Hindu religion and religious scriptures. Therefore, the governance means governance system of India. But the system was termed as Hindu religion. Opposing system means the opposition of Hindu religion and sanatan religion. India’s education system is devoid of country’s knowledge tradition.
Consequently, children hailing from Hindu community were never imparted with knowledge of sanatan religion and Hindu religion. Only minorities were made aware of their religions. The constitution has no such provision. Therefore, in Hindu community, children have no knowledge of their religion. However, they gain some knowledge through other means. They start to term knowledge spread by media and education institutions as true. Hindu religion was called as synonym of system at a time when the state controls the entire life in the society. The people give no attention to it. The truth is that the government has nothing to do with Hindu religion. There is no validation to the Hindu religious scriptures in the country. Only Constitution is supreme in the country. Therefore, attack on Hindu religion in the name of movement is nothing but deceiving people.
Had the meaning of system Hindu religion and Hindu society, the Hindus would have been provided with the rights to live according to religious scriptures. The Hindu would have right to kill foreigners. This duty has been mentioned in all the religious scriptures. Hindu society itself would have suppressed it. But there is no such arrangement. Therefore, all the movements aim at instilling fear among the majority people and punishing them. This is the duty of India’s current states.
All such movements are launched to attack sovereignty and unity of the country. It can’t be termed as movement. These are the anarchy. It’s serious crime. Therefore, it’s our duty to suppress, punish and control them.
First of all, majority of country must get freedom to kill foreigners because it has been mentioned in our religious scriptures.
All the people must be cautioned. If they failed to do so, they will be expelled from the society. But there is no such arrangement. Therefore, it’s our duty to suppress, control and punish such people.
Those who demand freedom must be controlled by declaring them unsocial and crime elements. The constitution provides for punishment for such people. But there are many intellectuals support them. Therefore, the states are disturbed in exercising their duty.
Exercising their rights provided in the constitution, the majority should declare such people as sinner. The people must not attack others. The constitution doesn’t allow us to do so.
But at the same time, you can express your thoughts freely. We should convene meetings and say that there are various foreigner groups to demolish our religion. Such elements can be checked so some extent.
Apart from that, the centre and the state governments must play role to control such bad elements in the country. No institution can be identified on the basis of some extremists. Therefore, there is no need to oppose a particular institution. Only unable and bad elements must be contained and punished. The people must demand that unsocial elements must be controlled.
Nobody has the right to say ‘bharat tere tukar honge’. Such people must be shot. At a time when someone tells that ‘bharat tere tukare honge’ he/she must be declared as enemy of the country. It’s duty of police to kill them.
The current state of India is unable to do so. The great decision makers must ponder over it. Despite living in India and declaring himself/herself free is nothing but sin and crime. The state governments must suppres them.
It’s serious to witness anarchy in the university like JNU. Such institutions must be shut down and a commission must be constituted to examine such issues. Several teachers are promoting sedation in the country in the name of freedom of expression. Such people must be suspended immediately. An agency must be constituted to examine the criminal record of such people given the danger to the country. The administration must make required provisions in this regard.