Addiction to be leader in condemning own country

It happens in fewer countries in the world that the main society is competing to condemn its own nation and tell a lie. As far as my knowledge is concerned, India is such society, Hindu is such society which has crossed all the boundaries in telling lie.

There are a large number of people who describe that India had been under Muslim Rule for 600 years. Rest of the people exaggerate it to 1000 years. They also talk of British Rule for 500 years. The number of such people is so large that you can’t term them as mad. What will they be called?

Famous US geographer Caplan along with other European and US scholars has given right word for it. They have said it organized amnesia spread in the Hindu. But at the same time, it seems opposite to soul. Because in case of amnesia, the people or the society itself is in forgotten state, then how will it organize amnesia? There are certain facts to understand this esoteric. Today, sign of atrocities done by Muslims against Hindu was not evident till beginning of 19th century. Because, till the time, Hindu was well aware of its valour and self-pride. They remembered that there were some greedy, sexual and unmannered people start to turn Muslim. They were indulging in various types of sins. There are many people who start to demolish temples. Hindu has been giving a lesson to such people. All these images were inscribed in their mind.

As it was evident in the impeachment leveled by parliamentarians like Edmund Berk, Mister Fox, Miser Grey against Warren Hastings in the British Parliament. The mean and ill-mannered workers of East India Company Clive and Warren Hastings along with mean people of Bengal indulged in unaccountable mean deeds, deceived the people and acquired a part of in close nexus with some mean Hindu and Muslim. Then some British people hoped that they will take over major part of Hindustan through lie, fraud, etc and they became active. Such employees include people like Alexander Daw, Henry Elliot etc. They learnt Persian with doing hard labour. They had roamed in region of Faras and Turkey. Elliot was working with East India Company and looking after administrative department. As he has written in the introduction of Part I of ‘The History of India’ that ‘the gentle Hindu treat us as mean and they hate us. When we claim to set up good governance in India, they indulge in joking. They extol their Hindu rulers whose regime allows anybody to roam with property and jewelry even in the night. Their homes had no locks. Hearing this, Elliot decided to collect such facts which can break Hindu’s perception. They wanted to spread message that Muslim Nawabs have given inflicting pain to Hindus who have done nothing. They asked Hindu not to boast of. This book containing 8 parts was reprinted in 2013. It has editor’s comment in the beginning followed by Henry Elliot’s main introduction. All these facts have been described between page 3-18. This book was published first of all in 1894. In the book, it has been said that no writer has presented the facts like this till 1880. I held discussion with many Indian and European scholars in this regard. All of them accepted that they knew nothing about history of that era (page 12-13).

He wrote that ‘the Bengali Hindus extols their Hindu rulers. It gives inflicting pain to us. Therefore, it has become necessary that we describe Mughal to create suspense among the Hindu about their own kings. Then they will be our fans’. Therefore, the book aims at create inferior complexity among intellectual Hindus.

But the problem was that since then no Indian Muslim boasted of their own kings. Meanwhile, the Christian Priests started to boast of other societies. It’s being discussed in the entire world. Therefore, taking advice from some priests, Elliot decided to boast of India. For this, he decided to take help from a priest Dawson teaching at a London based college. The process took time and Elliot died. Later, Dawson edited the book which was published.

The stories about Qasim, Mahmood Gajani and Muhammad Ghuri were presented in the book published in the middle of 19th century. The main thing is that these stories were not found either in any book or manuscript in Moghul King’s archive. Elliat claimed that he was roaming in Turkey and Faras. Later, whatever he listened, prepared manuscript and presented it in a London-based library. It was made very basis of that stories. It’s strange that India is being discussed and Mughal is being termed emperor of entire country. It’s also being said that they have large archive where no story or manuscript was found. Instead, they found some pages in Turkey and Faras. It will be judicious to discuss such claims here.

There was Turkish trader named Suleman who had visited India in 9th century. After returning home, he narrated the stories listened here in India. Elliot had claimed that some Turkish people had apprised him of it. He also claimed that someone has written it on the basis of memory and facts uttered by other people in Faras in 13rd and 14th century means 400 or 500 years after Suleman. Elliot found that manuscript and deposited it the London based library.

That manuscript has praised India. But after 1947, the Congress get written History books in which that part of praising of India was missing. The part of book in which India means Hindu was condemned is taught to all the Indian children including Hindu children in the name of History. In India, great scriptures, history books and literature books are easily available. These were rejected by saying that they are incomplete. Such imaginary stories are being taught as History. It doesn’t happen in any country in the world. We will provide facts based on evidences later.

First of all, we talk about Qasim. It has been described in the chapter 3 of part 2 of the book ‘The History of India’ written by Elliat and Dawson. In this regard, Elliot himself has written that we are writing about Qasim on the basis of a book being termed as ‘chachnama’. But in fact, we don’t know the name of that book is either chachnama or jujnama or something else. We have described it with reference of Muslim Darbari Farishta of 17th century. He has said that in 13rd century, someone Ali Kufi had written a book ‘Tarikh Ul Hind Va Sindh’ which was translated into Pahalvi languge. But original book was not available either in Hijaji or Pahalvi language and Farishta has written it either as chachnama or jujnama.

Later, Muhammad Bin Qasim was Persian youth whose father had become Muslim. In the age of 17, he got married to his uncle’s daughter Zubeda. After that, he used to indulge in looting in Sindh area. After three year in the age of 20, either he died or he was killed. If we accept this fact, then it becomes clear that he seems to be bad element. Elliot himself has written that in that era, Brahman emperors of Uddhandpur used to rule the entire region. They had owned mammoth army. In that condition, the story about some young boys with bad character defeating that mighty emperors is not soothing. But the Britishers did that. In the 20th century, English speaking Muslims highlighted that stories. Many patriot Hindus were seen creating ruckus over looting of Qasim. This is nothing but form of greatness of advertisement and inferiority complex. We will discuss about the subject of Gajani and Ghuri in the next issue.